Skip to main content
FARAPULSE device image over blue pulse indication background.

   

MANIFEST multicenter registries

MANIFEST multicenter registries overview

MANIFEST-17K multicenter registry1 was a retrospective observational study of the real-world commercial use of the FARAWAVE™ Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA) Catheter.

MANIFEST-US multicenter registry2 was a retrospective observational study of post-approval use in the US of the FARAWAVE PFA Catheter focused on 30-day safety and procedural characteristics. 

MANIFEST-US multicenter registry2 is a retrospective observational study of post-approval use in the US of the FARAWAVE™ Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA) Catheter focused on 30-day safety and procedural characteristics. Center-level data was collected across 102 US sites from more than 500 operators spanning February 2024 – July 2025.

Study design: Multicenter, retrospective, observational study

Patient population: 41,968 patients; most patients were de novo AF patients (73%) (first time ablation), undergoing ablation for paroxysmal AFib (54.0%) or persistent AFib (37.0%)

Reported outcomes: Safety


Key findings: MANIFEST-US

0.63%

major adverse event rate in nearly 42,000 patients

The major adverse event rate* was 0.63% with no reports of esophageal fistula, pulmonary vein stenosis, or persistent phrenic nerve injury.

The minor complication rate was 2.1% with a majority of events being vascular complications (0.96%) or pericarditis (0.52%).

*Due to the retrospective nature of the registry, the adverse event rate was not reported at a pre-specified timepoint.


Conclusions: MANIFEST-US

  • This data expands beyond the MANIFEST-17K registry further validating the consistent, strong safety profile of FARAPULSE PFA in an everyday all-comer real-world clinical patient population.
  • In nearly 42,000 patients treated across 102 centers by more than 500 operators, the FARAWAVE catheter demonstrated consistently low complication rates:
    • 0.63% major adverse event rate
    • 0 reported AE fistulas, PV stenosis or persistent phrenic nerve injury  
    • Low incidence of stroke (0.1%) and TIA (0.08%) within 7 days
    • Low rates of acute renal failure requiring hemodialysis (0.02%) 
    • Low rates of coronary spasm (0.1%)
    • Low rates of vascular access complications requiring intervention (0.18%) 

MANIFEST-17K multicenter registry1 was a retrospective observational study of the real-world commercial use of the FARAWAVE PFA Catheter. Center-level data was collected across 106 EU sites and 413 operators spanning a 2-year period (3/2021-3/2023); 91.4% of commercial centers reported.

Study design: Multicenter, retrospective, observational study

Patient population: 17,642 drug-refractory paroxysmal AFib patients

Reported outcomes: Safety


Key findings: MANIFEST-17K

Clinicians worldwide have confirmed the safety of FARAPULSE.

0

reports of esophageal fistula or dysmotility, pulmonary vein stenosis, or persistent phrenic nerve injury

<1%

major adverse event rate with the most common complication being 
pericardial tamponade 
(0.36%)*

Purple and blue heart in white shield icon.

Low rates of pulsed field energy-specific adverse events

  • 0.06% transient phrenic 
nerve paresis
  • 0.14% coronary spasm
  • 0.03% hemolysis/renal failure

Conclusions: MANIFEST-17K

  • This data expands beyond the initial 24 centers involved in the MANIFEST-PF3 registry, showing that the low rate of safety events continues as the technology is adopted by additional centers.
  • One of the goals of this registry was to look for any unusual adverse events that would only occur after thousands of procedures. Two rare events were noted: coronary spasm and hemolysis.
    • The rate of coronary spasm was 0.14% with a majority (88%) being proximity related occurring with off-label use of the catheter during mitral isthmus MI or CTI ablation.
    • Hemolysis resulting in acute renal failure was rare, managed with hydration and associated with a high number of lesions applied.

Next: See how FARAPULSE PFA compared to thermal ablation



References:
1. Ekanem, E., Neuzil, P., Reichlin, T. et al. Safety of pulsed field ablation in more than 17,000 patients with atrial fibrillation in the MANIFEST-17K study. Nat Med (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03114-3
2. Turagam, Mohit K., et al. "Multicenter Study on the Safety of Pulsed Field Ablation in Over 40,000 Patients: MANIFEST-US." JACC (2025)
3. Ekanem, Emmanuel, et al. "Multi-national survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety on the post-approval clinical use of pulsed field ablation (MANIFEST-PF)." Europace 24.8 (2022): 1256-1266